I was reading this post by an anti-vaccine crusader, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, and he mentions that one of the unexpected consequences of vaccines is that people would get dependent on them. The implications are that,then,there will always be a market for them. Clearly, I thought, this must be Bill Gates' motivation! The bastard intends to make a fortune once populations around the globe become dependent on his vaccination programs. Ask yourself: will the BMGF (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) always be around to vaccinate the entire globe for all infectious diseases for EVER and for FREE? If they do, I'll bet you dollars to donuts that they'll be buying the vaccines from companies that they own or have stock in. Once a population becomes dependent on a vaccine, what government is not going to start buying vaccines (at one time supplied by the BMGF) when the people start dying like flies? The reason they'll die en mass is that Bill and Melinda would have destroyed any natural immunity that evolution may have been working on.

However, with people like Obama supporting corporations in all their guises, there is little I can do to fight these trends, and the real reason I was led to post this is that it has dawned on me that viral disease is nothing more than a mechanism to keep populations in check. Therefore, if this is true, the way to get rid of viral infections is to lower the population density.

Who are the ones who get disease? Is it not the people who go out in crowed public places? Who escapes disease? Is it not people like Isaac Newton who escaped the plague by sequestering himself at his country estate? What animals are more prone to disease? Is it not the millions of fowl or hogs crowded together that come down with bird or swine flu?

If the BMGF were an ethical organization they would devote all the resources to lowering the population density of countries or increasing the hygiene (clean water and sewage facilities).

More on evolution: if you have a biosphere without pathogens that are capable of causing lethal or incapacitating epidemics, there will no doubt arise a very successful species; one so successful that it had to power to grow exponentially by eating every individual prey in sight. Nothing would stop it but it would end up extinct when it inevitably exhausted its food source. What could stop it from extinction? How about a virus that only affects a portion of the population?

Reference on overpopulation and disease